Article Sidebar

Published
Dec 4, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 109 Download : 94

Main Article Content

Abstract

In the evolving landscape of education, the integration of technology in classroom training has emerged as a pivotal aspect of pedagogical advancement. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of new technological tools and methods in enhancing teaching and learning experiences in Indonesian educational institutions. Employing a qualitative approach, students with qualitative insights from 30 in-depth interviews with pedagogy experts. The quantitative data were analyzed using statistical tools to gauge the prevalence and impact of technology integration, while the qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis to extract detailed perspectives on pedagogical transformations. The findings reveal a significant increase in student engagement and comprehension when interactive technologies, such as digital whiteboards and educational software, are incorporated into lessons. Additionally, teachers reported improved efficiency in lesson planning and delivery. The study highlights the potential of blended learning environments, which combine traditional teaching methods with digital tools, to enrich the educational experience. Despite some challenges related to resource availability and digital literacy, the overall response to technology integration in classrooms was overwhelmingly positive, suggesting a promising direction for future educational practices in Indonesia.

Keywords

Integrating Technology Classroom Training Educational Pedagogy

Article Details

References

  1. Basly, S. (2007). The internationalization of family sme an organizational learning and knowledge development perspective. Baltic Journal of Management, 2(2), 154–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465260710750973
  2. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654.
  3. Chanaa, A., & others. (2018). Deep learning for a smart e-Iearning system. 2018 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technologies and Applications (Cloudtech), 1–8.
  4. Chao, C.-T., Tsai, C.-L., Lin, M.-W., Yang, C.-W., Ho, C.-C., Chen, H.-L., Hsu, C., & Sheu, B.-C. (2022). Fully digital problem-based learning for undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 period: Practical considerations. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 121(10), 2130–2134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2021.11.011
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  7. Crook, C., & Bligh, B. (2016). Technology and the dis-placing of learning in educational futures. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 11, 162–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.09.001
  8. Cui, Y., Ma, Z., Wang, L., Yang, A., Liu, Q., Kong, S., & Wang, H. (2023). A survey on big data-enabled innovative online education systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100295
  9. Datzberger, S. (2018). Why education is not helping the poor. Findings from Uganda. World Development, 110(2018), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.022
  10. Domine, V. (2011). Building 21st-Century Teachers: An Intentional Pedagogy of Media Literacy Education. Action in Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2011.569457
  11. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 391–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1999.9672075
  12. Fiş Erümit, S. (2021). The distance education process in K–12 schools during the pandemic period: evaluation of implementations in Turkey from the student perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 75–94.
  13. Hidayat, D. S., & Sensuse, D. I. (2022). Knowledge Management Model for Smart Campus in Indonesia. Data, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/data7010007
  14. Jannah, F., & Fahlevi, R. (2018). Strengthening The Pancasila Character Values in Forming The Character of Pancasilais Generation. 1st International Conference on Creativity, Innovation and Technology in Education (IC-CITE 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/iccite-18.2018.18
  15. Kassotaki, O. (2019). Ambidextrous leadership in high technology organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 48(2), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.10.001
  16. Milutinović, V. (2022). Examining the influence of pre-service teachers’ digital native traits on their technology acceptance: A Serbian perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6483–6511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10887-y
  17. Neumeyer, X. (2021). Overcoming barriers to technology adoption when fostering entrepreneurship among the poor: The role of technology and digital literacy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(6), 1605–1618. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2989740
  18. Njideka, P., & Joseph, E. O. (2022). Organizational Learning And Resilience : A Case Of Family Businesses In Rivers State. Nigeria Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 135–144.
  19. Sow, M., & Aborbie, S. (2018). Impact of Leadership on Digital Transformation. Business and Economic Research, 8(3), 139. https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v8i3.13368
  20. Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11), e05410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410
  21. Umar, R., Yusuf, M., Maddatuang, Abbas, I., Basram, N. F., & Suprapta. (2018). Implementation of SM3T Alumni in Teacher Professional Education Program (Study of PPG SM3T Participants in the Universitas Negeri Makassar). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012207
  22. Waller, R. E., Lemoine, P. A., Mense, E. G., & Richardson, M. D. (2019). Higher education in search of competitive advantage: Globalization, technology and e-learning. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications, 3(8), 184–190.
  23. Wannapiroon, N., & Pimdee, P. (2022). Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: a conceptual model using a digital virtual classroom learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5689–5716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10849-w
  24. Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2022). The Development of Intelligent Education and Teachers’ Professional Informatization Led by an Intelligent Ubiquitous Network. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 3997080. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3997080