Main Article Content


This study aims to determine the increase in semester 1 student learning outcomes of the UKI Toraja Management study program in the Indonesian language course through the application of the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Cooperative Learning Model. The sample of this research is 25 students. Data collection techniques using observation and learning achievement tests. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques to describe the conditions of each variable. The results showed that the ability of lecturers to manage learning with an average score of 4.57 was in the very good category, student activity during the learning process was classified as active with an average percentage of 74.5% which was in the active category, and student learning outcomes after being taught using the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) cooperative learning model is classified as high with an average of 80.35. This shows that applying the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) cooperative learning model can improve student learning outcomes in semester 1 of the UKI Toraja management study program in the Indonesian Language Course.


cooperative learning model team assisted individualization type Indonesian language learning outcomes

Article Details

How to Cite
Baan , A. (2023). Implementation of the cooperative learning model team assisted individualization (TAI) in indonesian language lectures . International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 4(1), 31-44.


  1. Alshurideh, M., Salloum, S. A., Al Kurdi, B., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Understanding the quality determinants that influence the intention to use the mobile learning platforms: A practical study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(11), 157–183.
  2. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  3. El Mhouti, A., & Erradi, M. (2018). Towards a smart learning management system (smart-LMS) to improve collaborative learning in higher education. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.
  4. Firmansyah, A., & Jiwandono, N. R. (2022). Kecenderungan Guru dalam Menerapkan Pendekatan Student Centre Learning dan Teacher Centre Learning dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Guru Indonesia, 2(1), 33–39.
  5. Hantoobi, S., Wahdan, A., Salloum, S. A., & Shaalan, K. (2021). Integration of knowledge management in a virtual learning environment: A systematic review. Recent Advances in Technology Acceptance Models and Theories, 247–272.
  6. Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments - a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–14.
  7. Khodeir, N., Wanas, N., & Elazhary, H. (2018). Constraint-based student modeling in probability story problems with scaffolding techniques. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(1), 178–205.
  8. Lee, M. C. C., Idris, M. A., & Tuckey, M. (2019). Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development International, 22(3), 257–282.
  9. Lumbantoruan, J. H., Dane, G., & Mahyar, B. (2022). Comparison of Mathematics Learning Outcomes with Student Team Achievement Divisions and Team Assisted Individualization Model. Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World, 1(3), 132–140.
  10. Lytras, M. D., Serban, A. C., Ruiz, M. J. T., Ntanos, S., & Sarirete, A. (2022). Translating knowledge into innovation capability: An exploratory study investigating the perceptions on distance learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic - the case of Mexico. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100258.
  11. Novalinda, R., Dakhi, O., Fajra, M., Azman, A., Masril, M., Ambiyar, A., & Verawadina, U. (2020). Learning Model Team Assisted Individualization Assisted Module to Improve Social Interaction and Student Learning Achievement. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12A), 7974–7980.
  12. Reiser, B. J. (2018). Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work. Scaffolding: A Special Issue of the Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304.
  13. Sekaran, U. (2009). Research methods for business 4th edition. Hoboken. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Sierra, J. (2020). The potential of simulations for developing multiple learning outcomes: The student perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100361.
  15. Slavin, R. E. (1984). Team assisted individualization: Cooperative learning and individualized instruction in the mainstreamed classroom. Remedial and Special Education, 5(6), 33–42.
  16. Trisnayanti, Y., Ashadi, Sunarno, W., & Masykuri, M. (2020). Creative thinking profile of junior high school students on learning science Creative thinking profile of junior high school students on learning science.
  17. van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71–89.
  18. Verde, A., & Valero, J. M. (2021). Teaching and learning modalities in higher education during the pandemic: responses to coronavirus disease 2019 From Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648592.
  19. Zekos, G. I. (2003). MNEs, globalisation and digital economy: legal and economic aspects. Managerial Law, 45(1/2), 1–296.
  20. Zhang, P. (2021). Understanding Digital Learning Behaviors: Moderating Roles of Goal Setting Behavior and Social Pressure in Large-Scale Open Online Courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 783610.