Article Sidebar

Accepted
Jun 28, 2025
Published
Jun 28, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 16 Download : 17

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores the strategies implemented by the National Unity and Politics Agency (Bakesbangpol) in strengthening religious harmony and examines the challenges encountered in their application. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis to gain an in-depth understanding of Bakesbangpol’s initiatives. The findings reveal that Bakesbangpol employs a multifaceted approach, including interfaith dialogues, conflict prevention mechanisms, community engagement, and public education campaigns, all aimed at fostering understanding and reducing tensions among diverse religious communities. Interfaith dialogues and the Forum for Religious Harmony (FKUB) play pivotal roles in mediating conflicts and promoting peaceful coexistence. However, the study also identifies significant challenges, such as deep-rooted social prejudices, the spread of misinformation on social media, and resource limitations that hinder the full realization of religious harmony. Despite these obstacles, Bakesbangpol’s efforts have positively impacted community relations, highlighting the importance of proactive and collaborative government-led strategies in managing religious diversity. The study concludes with recommendations to enhance these initiatives through expanded dialogue programs, improved digital literacy, strengthened community engagement, and increased resource allocation to ensure sustainable interfaith harmony.

Keywords

Religious Harmony National Unity and Politics Agency Interfaith Dialogue Conflict Prevention Community Engagement

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL), the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Sultan, M. H., Pirol, A., & Salmilah, S. (2025). Strategies of the National Unity and Politics Agency in Strengthening Religious Harmony. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 6(1), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v6i1.242

References

  1. Ahmed, S., & Gil-Lopez, T. (2022). Engaging With Vilifying Stereotypes: The Role of YouTube Algorithmic Use in Perpetuating Misinformation About Muslim Congresswomen. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(4), 864–888. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221110113
  2. Ali, B. (2024). Fostering Harmonious Societal Constructs Through Islamic Principles. Al-Risalah, 15(1), 324–353. https://doi.org/10.34005/alrisalah.v15i1.3518
  3. Alshamary, M. R. (2021). Religious Peacebuilding in Iraq: Prospects and Challenges from the Hawza. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 15(4), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2021.1954753
  4. Aqil, A. R., Malik, M., Jacques, K. A., Lee, K., Parker, L. J., Kennedy, C. E., Mooney, G., & German, D. (2021). Engaging in Anti-Oppressive Public Health Teaching: Challenges and Recommendations. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 7(4), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799211045407
  5. Aruman, I., Hasbi, Firman, & Ilham, D. (2024). Strategic Management in Strengthening Religious Moderation : A Case Study in Primary Schools. International Journal of Asian Education, 5(4), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v5i4.455
  6. Basinger, D. (2021). Religious Diversity: A Philosophical Assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315244655
  7. Chen, K., Jin, Y., & Shao, A. (2022). Science Factionalism: How Group Identity Language Affects Public Engagement With Misinformation and Debunking Narratives on a Popular Q&A Platform in China. Social Media and Society, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077019
  8. Ezzy, D., Bouma, G., Barton, G., Halafoff, A., Banham, R., Jackson, R., & Beaman, L. (2020). Religious Diversity in Australia: Rethinking Social Cohesion. Religions, 11(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11020092
  9. Fanzikri, M. (2024). Inter-Religious Harmony: The Challenging Village Funds Management in the Regions of Sharia Law Implementation. Harmoni, 23(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v23i1.760
  10. Freire, P. (2020). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. In Toward a Sociology of Education (pp. 374–386). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429339530
  11. Fritzsche, L. (2022). Integrating Contemplative Pedagogy and Anti-oppressive Pedagogy in Geography Higher Education Classrooms. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 46(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.1946766
  12. Gladovic, C., Tai, J. H. M., & Dawson, P. (2022). Qualitative Approaches to Researching Evaluative Judgement in Pedagogical Activities: A Case Study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1901854
  13. Imperato, C., Schneider, B. H., Caricati, L., Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Mancini, T. (2021). Allport Meets Internet: A Meta-analytical Investigation of Online Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Reduction. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 81(March), 131–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.01.006
  14. Indainanto, Y. I., Dalimunthe, M. A., Sazali, H., Rubino, & Kholil, S. (2023). Islamic Communication in Voicing Religious Moderation as an Effort to Prevent Conflicts of Differences in Beliefs. Pharos Journal of Theology, 104(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.104.415
  15. Iversen, R. L. (2023). The Convivial Concealment of Religion: Navigating Religious Diversity during Meals in Early Childhood Education–A Norwegian Case. British Journal of Religious Education, 45(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2022.2138829
  16. Kastner, M., & Motschilnig, R. (2022). Interconnectedness of Adult Basic Education, Community-Based Participatory Research, and Transformative Learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 72(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136211044154
  17. Kirk, M. (2024). Student Voice and Agency for Transformative Change in Matters that Matter: Impactful Inquiry in Primary Science. Australian Educational Researcher, 52(1), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00721-4
  18. Komendantova, N., Erokhin, D., & Albano, T. (2023). Misinformation and Its Impact on Contested Policy Issues: The Example of Migration Discourses. Societies, 13(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13070168
  19. Kruja, G. (2022). Interfaith Harmony through Education System of Religious Communities. Religion & Education, 49(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2021.2009305
  20. Lederach, J. (2015). Little Book of Conflict Transformation: Clear Articulation of the Guiding Principles by a Pioneer in the Field. Simon and Schuster. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=xl2CDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA1
  21. Masood, M. (2024). Facebook Interfaith Contact and Social Distance toward Religious Minorities. Asian Journal of Communication, 34(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2023.2287745
  22. Modood, T., & Sealy, T. (2021). Freedom of Religion and the Accommodation of Religious Diversity: Multiculturalising Secularism. Religions, 12(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100868
  23. Moh. Muslih, Dewi Anggraeni, & Mochamad Iqbal Abdul Ghonii. (2023). Harmony in Diversity: Exploring Religious Moderation Perspectives through Interfaith Dialogue. Jurnal Penelitian, 20(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v20i2.2275
  24. Morais, L. M. de O., Kuhlberg, J., Ballard, E., Indvik, K., Rocha, S. C., Sales, D. M., de Oliveira Cardoso, L., Gouveia, N., de Lima Friche, A. A., & Caiaffa, W. T. (2021). Promoting Knowledge to Policy Translation for Urban Health Using Community-based System Dynamics in Brazil. Health Research Policy and Systems, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00663-0
  25. Mtombeni, B., Shoba, M., & Kwanhi, T. (2025). Education as a Pedagogy of the Oppressed : South African Education as Envisaged by John Langalibalele Dube. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2468561
  26. Nugroho, M. A., Islam, U., & Salatiga, N. (2024). Religious Tolerance Model in Salatiga: Analysis of the Implementation of Religious Moderation Concept in a Multicultural City. International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, and Religion (IJoASER), 7(4), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.33648/ijoaser.v7i4.732
  27. Olmedo, L., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (2022). Community-Based Social Enterprises as Actors for Neo-Endogenous Rural Development: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach☆. Rural Sociology, 87(4), 1191–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12462
  28. Peters, M. A. (2022). Limiting the Capacity for Hate: Hate Speech, Hate Groups and the Philosophy of Hate. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(14), 2325–2330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1802818
  29. Pettigrew, T. F. (2021). Advancing Intergroup Contact Theory: Comments on the Issue’s Articles. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12423
  30. Ragnarsdóttir, H., Jónsdóttir, H., Gunnarsson, G. J., & Finnbogason, G. E. (2020). Diversity, Religion and Tolerance: Young Adults’ Views on Cultural and Religious Diversity in a Multicultural Society in Iceland. Religion & Education, 47(4), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2020.1828233
  31. Riaz, D. M., Baloch, F., Siddiqui, M., Ejaz, R., & Bashir, M. (2023). The Role of Islamic Education in Promoting Peace and Tolerance. Al-Qantara, 9(4), 307–327.
  32. Sawalhi, R., Alsaleh, A., & Khulief, J. (2024). Practicing Islamic-Based Leadership: Arab Principals ’ Perspectives. IJAE: International Journal of Asian Education, 5(3), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v5i3.439
  33. Shipe, R. (2025). Exploring Conflict Transformation Through Experiences With Art. Art Education, 78(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2024.2428122
  34. Southworth, J. (2022). Bridging Critical Thinking and Transformative Learning: The Role of Perspective-Taking. Theory and Research in Education, 20(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785221090853
  35. Wajdi, M. B. N., Fathurrohman, A., & Pamungkas, M. I. (2024). The Approach of Religious Pluralism in Public Policy: An Analysis of Presidential Regulation Number 58 of 2023. Journal of Social Political Sciences, 5(3), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.52166/jsps.v5i3.249
  36. Widiyanto, A. (2023). Interfaith Dialogue in the Post-Truth Age: Challenges, Strategies, and Prospects. Religious Inquiries, 12(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.22034/ri.2023.337410.1602
  37. Woiwode, C., Schäpke, N., Bina, O., Veciana, S., Kunze, I., Parodi, O., Schweizer-Ries, P., & Wamsler, C. (2021). Inner Transformation to Sustainability as a Deep Leverage Point: Fostering New Avenues for Change through Dialogue and Reflection. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 841–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00882-y
  38. Zamri, N. A. K., Mohamad Nasir, N. N. A., Hassim, M. N., & Ramli, S. M. (2023). Digital Hate Speech and Othering: The Construction of Hate Speech from Malaysian Perspectives. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2229089
  39. Zarzycka, B., & Puchalska-Wasyl, M. M. (2020). Can Religious and Spiritual Struggle Enhance Well-Being? Exploring the Mediating Effects of Internal Dialogues. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(4), 1897–1912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-00755-w
  40. Zuhri, M. K., Dimas Maulana, M., Mufti, M., & Safitri, R. M. (2024). Tolerance From Below: Grassroots Movement and Interfaith Collaboration for Religious Moderation in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian, 21(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v21i1.2085