Challenges and Strategies of Islamic Religious Education Teachers in the Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum
Abstract
Implementing the Merdeka Curriculum requires teachers to translate national policy into workable classroom practices, a task that becomes more complex in resource-constrained rural schools. This study examined the challenges faced by Islamic Religious Education teachers, the strategies they developed, and the perceived implications of those strategies for learning at a public senior high school in Luwu Regency, Indonesia. An intrinsic qualitative case study was conducted using in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. Two certified Islamic Religious Education teachers served as the primary participants, while contextual information from school stakeholders and a student supported triangulation. The findings show that implementation challenges were systemic and interconnected, encompassing difficulties in differentiated instruction and formative assessment, unstable internet access, limited contextual teaching resources, administrative workload, and uneven family support. Teachers responded by modifying established teaching routines, adapting existing learning documents, mobilizing local cultural resources, collaborating with colleagues, and positively reframing recurring constraints. These practices reflected iterative, practical-evaluative, and projective forms of teacher agency. The strategies were associated with greater classroom participation, stronger communication and collaboration skills, and more meaningful value learning, although the evidence remains qualitative and context-specific. The study concludes that successful curriculum implementation in rural settings depends on organizational support that protects teacher agency, strengthens professional learning communities, reduces avoidable administrative burdens, and permits context-sensitive adaptation.
References
Bachtiar, B., & Puspitasari, M. (2024). Barriers and strategies in implementing innovative and collaborative learning: A case of Indonesian English language teaching. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 11(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v11i1.38434
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601555
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
de Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). School-based collaboration as a learning context for teachers: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101927
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hakim, M. I., & Alfitri, B. (2025). The implementation of Kurikulum Merdeka in Islamic education in the 3T regions of North Lombok. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 12(3), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.69896/modeling.v12i3.2969
Iman, B. R. N., Nuris, M., & Syaripuddin, R. (2023). Integrated technology in learning viewed from the lens of 21st century education: A qualitative study on teacher’s efforts in improving Islamic education quality. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(1), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v12i01.3038
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2024). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2024 tentang kurikulum pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nurlaili, Suranda, N., & Purwanto. (2024). Analisis inovasi Kurikulum Merdeka berdiferensiasi pada pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) di sekolah umum. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 11(1), 821–831. https://doi.org/10.69896/modeling.v11i1.2429
Pantić, N. (2015). A model for study of teacher agency for social justice. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 759–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044332
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.006
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL), the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)











