Article Sidebar

Published
Apr 13, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2640 Download : 1713

Main Article Content

Abstract

The employee’s in-role and extra-role performance has badly effected due to prevalence of COVID-19. The aim of the study is to examine the relationship of perceived organizational support and employee performance. The role of organizational justice is examined as a moderator. A sample of 222 bank employees was selected on convenience basis.  The responses were recorded through closed ended questionnaires. The responses were analyzed through Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling Method. In times of COVID-19 the perceived organizational support has an antidotal effect on employee’s performance. At the same time the organizational justice has a significant role in the relationship of perceived organizational support and employee performance. The managers interested to have good performance of employees have to ensure organizational support along with justice in organizational practices. The perceived organizational support and justice induce trust among employees and compel them to work with diligence. The organizational justice has greater contributions towards performance. The study has examined the non-linear relationship between perceived organizational support and employees’ performance in bank employees in the context of COVID-19. In such times the people expect increased need for organizational support to fight out the challenges

Keywords

Banks, COVID-19 perceived organizational support organizational justice employee performance organizational justice theory

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL), the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Shabbir, T., Naz, K., & Trivedi, S. D. (2021). Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Performance: A Moderating Role of Organizational Justice during COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 2(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v2i1.14

References

  1. Aube, C., Rousseau, V., & Morin, E. M. (2007). Perceived organizational support and organizational commitment. Journal of managerial Psychology.
  2. Becker, T. E., & Kernan, M. C. (2003). Matching commitment to supervisors and organizations to in-role and extra-role performance. Human performance, 16(4), 327-348.
  3. Becker, T. E., & Kernan, M. C. (2003). Matching commitment to supervisors and organizations to in-role and extra-role performance. Human performance, 16(4), 327-348.
  4. Blakely, G. L., Andrews, M. C., & Moorman, R. H. (2005). The moderating effects of equity sensitivity on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2), 259-273.
  5. Bosilj‐Vukšić, V., & Indihar‐Štemberger, M. (2008). The impact of business process orientation on financial and non‐financial performance. Business Process Management Journal.
  6. Byrne, Z. S., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
  7. Byrne, Z. S., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
  8. Caligiuri, P., De Cieri, H., Minbaeva, D., Verbeke, A., & Zimmermann, A. (2020). International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice. Journal of International Business Studies, 1.
  9. Shabbir, T., Mohsin, & Auj E Kamal. (2020). Use of 'Open Data' in Urdu Literature Research and its Effectiveness. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 4(1), 219-230. Retrieved from http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/jms/article/viewFile/3734/1824
  10. Carnevale, J. B., & Hatak, I. (2020). Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research.
  11. Chegini M (2009) The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Am. J. Econ. Business Admin. 1 (2), 171- 174
  12. Chegini, M. G. (2009). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 1(2), 173-176.
  13. Chen, S. Y., Wu, W. C., Chang, C. S., Lin, C. T., Kung, J. Y., Weng, H. C., ... & Lee, S. I. (2015). Organizational justice, trust, and identification and their effects on organizational commitment in hospital nursing staff. BMC health services research, 15(1), 363.
  14. Colakoglu, U., Culha, O., & Atay, H. (2010). The effects of perceived organisational support on employees' affective outcomes: Evidence from the hotel industry. Tourism and hospitality management, 16(2), 125-150.
  15. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Zapata, C. P., & Rich, B. L. (2012). Explaining the justice–performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer?. Journal of applied psychology, 97(1), 1.
  16. Dawley, D., Houghton, J. D., & Bucklew, N. S. (2010). Perceived organizational support and turnover intention: The mediating effects of personal sacrifice and job fit. The Journal of social psychology, 150(3), 238-257.
  17. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of applied psychology, 75(1), 51.
  18. Enoksen, E. (2015). Examining the dimensionality of Colquitt's Organizational Justice Scale in a public health sector context. Psychological reports, 116(3), 723-737.
  19. Flint, D., Haley, L. M., & McNally, J. J. (2012). Dimensionality of organizational justice in a call center context. Psychological reports, 110(2), 677-693.
  20. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
  21. Gilliland, S. W., & Paddock, L. (2005). Organizational justice across human resource management decisions. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 20, 149-175.
  22. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432.
  23. Shabbir, T., M Nadeemullah. (2020). Impact of ‘Open Data’ and its Effectiveness for Pakistan Social Issues: Learning from the UK Experience, 25(1), 253-272. Retrieved from https://journal.psc.edu.pk/index.php/pp/article/view/395
  24. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432.
  25. Haines III, V. Y., Patient, D. L., & Marchand, A. (2018). Systemic justice and burnout: A multilevel model. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(1), 92-111.
  26. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long range planning, 45(5-6), 320-340.
  27. Hofmeyer, A., Taylor, R., & Kennedy, K. (2020). Fostering compassion and reducing burnout: How can health system leaders respond in the Covid-19 pandemic and beyond?. Nurse Education Today.
  28. Irefin, P., & Mechanic, M. A. (2014). Effect of employee commitment on organizational performance in Coca Cola Nigeria Limited Maiduguri, Borno state. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(3), 33-41.
  29. Kappagoda, U. W. M. R. (2018). Self-efficacy, task performance and contextual performance: A Sri Lankan experience. Available at SSRN 3198802.
  30. Kappagoda, U. W. M. R. (2018). Self-efficacy, task performance and contextual performance: A Sri Lankan experience.
  31. Konijnenburg, L. (2010). The effect of perceived supervisor support and perceived organizational support on employees’ resistance to change. School of Business and Economics, 9(5), 55-71.
  32. Shabbir, T., M Nadeemullah, & Saeed Memon. (2020). Uses and Impact of ‘Open Data’ Technology for Developing Social Sector in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1), 50-64. Retrieved from https://www.pjmr.org/pjmr/article/view/24
  33. Krishnan, J., & Mary, V. S. (2012). Perceived organisational support–an overview on its antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 2-3.
  34. Meyers, M. C., Kooij, D., Kroon, B., de Reuver, R., & van Woerkom, M. (2020). Organizational support for strengths use, work engagement, and contextual performance: The moderating role of age. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(2), 485-502.
  35. Miao, R., & Kim, H. G. (2010). Perceived organizational support, job satisfaction and employee performance: An Chinese empirical study. Journal of Service Science and Management, 3(02), 257.
  36. Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior?. Academy of Management journal, 41(3), 351-357.
  37. Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior?. Academy of Management journal, 41(3), 351-357.
  38. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal, 36(3), 527-556.
  39. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal, 36(3), 527-556.
  40. Omar, F., Halim, F., Zainah, A., & Farhadi, H. (2011). Stress and job satisfaction as antecedents of workplace deviant behavior. Deviant Behavior, 16, 17.
  41. Shabbir, T., Abro.M. (2019). Impact of ‘Open Data’ on ‘News Media’ and its Effectiveness in Social and Political Development of Pakistan (A Case Study from UK Perspective). Dialogue, 14(3), 161-171. Retrieved from https://ideapublishers.org/index.php/lassij/article/view/163/99
  42. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of applied psychology, 86(5), 825.
  43. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of applied psychology, 86(5), 825.
  44. Stamenkovic, S., Njegovan, B. R., & Vukadinovic, M. S. (2018). Intra-national diversity. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management.
  45. Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. Journal of business and psychology, 21(3), 377-405.
  46. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of applied psychology, 87(3), 590.