Article Sidebar

Published
Sep 21, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 103 Download : 112

Main Article Content

Abstract

It's a study with a qualitative approach through action research. With the aim of teaching addition using the Mariela-Lehren-addieren method to students in 3rd and 4th grade. The Method of teaching addition is from the teaching of the basic skills of mathematical thinking, design and evaluation of the teaching strategy, the concept of number positional value, sign, concept of grouping, regrouping of numbers, the algorithm of addition, the practice of it with numerical exercises and reasoned problems. It is concluded that 18 students out of 21, achieved the learning of addition up to 4 digits with the Mariela-Lehren-addieren method through action research. It's inferred that the problems that arise in the learning of the addition, can be rooted by lack of systematic approach in previous educational cycles of the student, absences, learning problems, teaching models, motivation and school synergy.

Keywords

mathematical skills arithmetic elementary school method Mariela-Lehren-addieren educational lag

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL), the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
González-López, M., & Angel-G, F. (2024). Management pedagogy:: The addition in elementary school . International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 5(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v5i1.192

References

  1. Ali, N., & Ullah, S. (2020). Review to Analyze and Compare Virtual Chemistry Laboratories for Their Use in Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3563–3574. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00185
  2. Bishop, P. A., Downes, J. M., Netcoh, S., Farber, K., DeMink-Carthew, J., Brown, T., & Mark, R. (2020). Teacher Roles in Personalized Learning Environments. The Elementary School Journal, 121(2), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1086/711079
  3. Broom, C. (2015). Empowering students: Pedagogy that benefits educators and learners. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 14(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173415597142
  4. Cheng, Y. C. (2022). School Effectiveness and School-Based Management. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267980
  5. Doruk, O., & Sarikaya, R. (2023). An Examination of the Studies Between 2013-2022 on the Use of Virtual Laboratories in Science Education. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(3), 1451–1485. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1264589
  6. Elfaki, N. K., Abdulraheem, I., & Abdulrahim, R. (2019). Impact of E-learning vs Traditional Learning on Student’s Performance and Attitude. International Medical Journal, 24(3), 225–233.
  7. Faranto, A. S. D. (2020, February 18). Penyaluran Dana BOS 2020: Wujudkan Merdeka Belajar! . Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/artikel--penyaluran-dana-bos-2020-wujudkan-merdeka-belajar
  8. Grace, G. (1995). School Leadership: Beyond Education Management - An Essay in Policy Scholarship. UK The Falmer Press.
  9. Hastuti, R. K. (2019, August 19). Sasar 271 Ribu Sekolah, Dana BOS 2020 Tembus Rp 54,3 T. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20190819190242-4-93121/sasar-271-ribu-sekolah-dana-bos-2020-tembus-rp-543-t
  10. Heath, J. R., & McCann, L. (2021). Leadership lessons untold: A new history of Robert McNamara’s World Bank. Leadership, 17(5), 606–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211010600
  11. Kurba, M. I. H. (n.d). Menyoal Anggaran Pendidikan. Ministry of Finance Indonesia. Accessed through https://anggaran.kemenkeu.go.id/in/post/menyoal-anggaran-pendidikan.
  12. Kurba, M. I. H. (n.d.). Menyoal Anggaran Pendidikan. Indonesian Ministry of Finance.
  13. McMahon, G. (2009). Critical Thinking and ICT Integration in a Western Australian Secondary School. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 269–281.
  14. Milligan, M., Mankelwicz, J., & See, H. P. (2022). Narcissism as a global barrier to education for sustainable development. Perspectives in Education, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v40.i3.3
  15. Milosevic, I., Maric, S., & Lončar, D. (2020). Defeating the Toxic Boss: The Nature of Toxic Leadership and the Role of Followers. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051819833374
  16. Mohd Elmagzoub Babiker, A. A. (2015). For Effective Use of Multimedia in Education, Teachers Must Develop their Own Educational Multimedia Applications. In TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 14, Issue 4).
  17. Mulya, C. (2019). Implementasi Pembiayaan Pendidikan Melalui Pengelolaan Dana BOS dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan. Indonesian Journal of Education Management and Administration Review, 3.
  18. Okebukola, P. A., Suwadu, B., Oladejo, A., Nyandwi, R., Ademola, I., Okorie, H., & Awaah, F. (2020). Delivering High School Chemistry During COVID-19 Lockdown: Voices from Africa. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3285–3289. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00725
  19. Pekkolay, S. (2021). Effective School Management. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy , 5(8), 231–235.
  20. Pontoh, J., Ilat, V., Manossoh, H., Magister Akuntansi, P., & Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Sam Ratulangi, F. (n.d.). Analisis Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) pada Satuan Pendidikan Dasar di Kota Kotamobagu. E-Journal UNSRAT, 223–232.
  21. Poster, C. (2005). Restructuring: The Key to Effective School Management (S. Blandford & J. Welton, Eds.). Routledge.
  22. Riswanto, Suseno, N., Partono, Harjati, P., & Dedy, H. (2019). School Laboratory Management Information System. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1361(1), 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1361/1/012068
  23. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
  24. Shahzadi, I. (2023). Role of Laboratories and Science Teaching Material in Science Teaching and Students Learning at Secondary Level in Public Schools. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(II). https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-II)23
  25. Solari, M., Vizquerra, M. I., & Engel, A. (2023). Students’ interests for personalized learning: an analysis guide. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(3), 1073–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00656-3
  26. Sugita, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2010). What can teachers do to motivate their students? A classroom research on motivational strategy use in the Japanese EFL context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501220802450470
  27. Tang, Q., Zhang, T., & Jiang, L. (2023). Influence of blended instruction on students’ learning effectiveness: the role of Flow. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1891–1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11224-z
  28. York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What Do We Know About Teacher Leadership? Findings From Two Decades of Scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255