Article Sidebar

Published
Sep 21, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 30 Download : 26

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the E-Performance program on the Merdeka Mengajar Platform at SMPN 1 Maiwa using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. This research adopts a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through interviews, observations, and documentation. The evaluation results for the context aspect indicate that the implementation of E-Performance is motivated by the need to improve the efficiency of teacher performance appraisal and to address weaknesses in psychological support and classroom management as shown by the education report card. Teachers and the principal demonstrate a clear understanding of the role of E-Performance in supporting data-driven learning, although student involvement remains limited. In the input aspect, it was found that teachers’ readiness to use E-Performance is uneven, training has not been systematic, and technical issues such as internet access continue to pose challenges. Additionally, internal regulations and external supervision are not yet fully optimized. The process aspect shows that the program is routinely carried out through the completion of RHK and reporting activities; however, it still faces operational technical difficulties and a lack of follow-up supervision focused on improvement. Meanwhile, in the product aspect, the E-Performance program positively impacts time efficiency, reporting consistency, and teachers’ reflective awareness. Nonetheless, the increase in motivation and innovation in learning is uneven, and the use of evaluation results for professional development remains limited. These findings highlight the need to strengthen training, internal regulations, infrastructure support, and ongoing monitoring strategies so that E-Performance can serve as an effective and sustainable tool for improving teacher performance.

Keywords

E-Performance Merdeka Mengajar program evaluation CIPP teacher performance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL), the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership (IJEAMaL) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Darmawati, D., Sahraini, S., & Kartini, K. (2024). Evaluation of E-Performance CIPP Model on the Merdeka Mengajar Platform at SMPN 1 Maiwa. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 5(2), 87-99. Retrieved from https://harpressid.com/IJEAMaL/article/view/282

References

  1. Abu Bakar, A. R., Ahmad, S. Z., Wright, N. S., & Skoko, H. (2017). The propensity to business startup: Evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) data in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 9(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-11-2016-0049
  2. Achtenhagen, L. (2017). Media Entrepreneurship—Taking Stock and Moving Forward. JMM International Journal on Media Management, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2017.1298941
  3. Alonso, M. A. P., & de Castro, B. A. M. (2020). Resilience and Entrepreneurship, Aligning Theoretical and Methodological Approaches. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, 14(2), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52294-0_21
  4. Araujo, L. M. de, Priadana, S., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Digital leadership in business organizations. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 2(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v2i1.18
  5. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Amuzu, J. (2019). Farmcrowdy: digital business model innovation for farming in Nigeria. Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies, 9(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/EEMCS-03-2019-0065
  6. Bosma, N., Hill, S., Ionescu-Somers, A., Kelley, D., Levie, J., & Tarnawa, A. (2020). GEM - Global entrepreneurshio monitor.
  7. Campagnolo, D., Laffineur, C., Leonelli, S., Martiarena, A., Tietz, M. A., & Wishart, M. (2022). Stay alert, save businesses. Planning for adversity among immigrant entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 28(7), 1773–1799. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2022-0164
  8. Cenamor, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019). How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 100(April), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.035
  9. Chang, E. P. C., Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., Kellermanns, F. W., & Chua, J. H. (2009). Family Social Capital, Venture Preparedness, and Start-Up Decisions. Family Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509332327
  10. Cunningham, J. A., Lehmann, E. E., Menter, M., & Seitz, N. (2019). The impact of university focused technology transfer policies on regional innovation and entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1451–1475.
  11. Fatoki, O. (2018). The impact of entrepreneurial resilience on the success of small and medium enterprises in South Africa. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072527
  12. Gay, B. (2014). Open innovation, networking, and business model dynamics: the two sides. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-3-2
  13. Greenfield, S., & Veríssimo, D. (2019). To What Extent Is Social Marketing Used in Demand Reduction Campaigns for Illegal Wildlife Products? Insights From Elephant Ivory and Rhino Horn. Social Marketing Quarterly, 25(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500418813543
  14. Hirdinis, M. (2019). Capital structure and firm size on firm value moderated by profitability. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/204
  15. Hoang, G., Luu, T., Nguyen, T., Tang, T. T., & Pham, N. T. (2023). Entrepreneurial leadership fostering service innovation in the hospitality firms: the roles of knowledge acquisition, market-sensing capability and competitive intensity. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-08-2022-0969
  16. Hudson, P., Bubeck, P., & Thieken, A. H. (2022). A comparison of flood-protective decision-making between German households and businesses. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09982-1
  17. Johnston, V. R. (2011). Entrepreneurial management and public policy 2nd edition. In Entrepreneurial Management and Public Policy 2nd Edition. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84895373087&partnerID=40&md5=725caded82ceee955b9b74574c6d330e
  18. Korayim, D., Shaik, A. S., Agarwal, R., Nijjer, S., & Sasso, P. (2025). Entrepreneurial orientation and sustainable business model innovation through technology transfer. A study of SMEs leadership in knowledge-based economies. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2023-0920
  19. Moghavvemi, S., & salleh, N. A. M. (2014). Malaysian entrepreneurs propensity to use IT innovation. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-05-2012-0026
  20. Naminse, E. (2018). Does farmer entrepreneurship alleviate rural poverty in China? Evidence from guangxi province. PLoS ONE, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194912
  21. Neumeyer, X. (2021). Overcoming barriers to technology adoption when fostering entrepreneurship among the poor: The role of technology and digital literacy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(6), 1605–1618. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2989740
  22. Pathak, M. D. (2023). Role of entrepreneurial resilience in SMEs to promote marketing and entrepreneurship amid Covid19 challenges. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-04-2022-0050
  23. Rogan, M., & Mors, M. L. (2017). Managerial Networks and Exploration in a Professional Service Firm. Organization Studies, 38(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616663243
  24. Salam, R., Bahasruddin, A., Wijaya, I. D., & Faisal, M. (2024). Strategies For Enhancing Resilience In Government Governance In The Digital Era. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, XX(2), 309–326.
  25. Shi, W., & Weber, M. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurs’ prior experience and communication networks on perceived knowledge access. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 1406–1426. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2020-0365
  26. Turan, M., & Kara, A. (2018). Online social media usage behavior of entrepreneurs in an emerging market: Reasons, expected benefits and intentions. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 20(2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-09-2016-0034
  27. Venczel, T. B., Berényi, L., & Hriczó, K. (2024). The Project and Risk Management Challenges of Start-ups. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 21(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.21.2.2024.2.8
  28. Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., & Dumay, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119735
  29. Zhu, Z., & Lin, S. fu. (2019). Understanding entrepreneurial perceptions in the pursuit of emerging e-business opportunities: The dimensions and drivers. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.015.